Jávea.com | Xàbia.com
Search

José Chulvi: «The house is on protected undeveloped land and the urban planning infraction does not prescribe»

26 October 2022 - 08: 39

El Mayor of Xàbia, José Chulvi, has once again responded to the statements made by both the Popular Party spokesperson, Rosa Cardona, and the second joint statement issued by the opposition spokesmen (PP, C's and Compromís) on the situation of the municipal architect's house located in the area of ​​the granadella.

The first mayor, once again, has reiterated that "it is a lie that a requalification of the General Plan has been made. Before Forest Park was declared, there were already houses." Faced with this demonstration, Chulvi added that it was "in 2010, when the PSOE was not yet in government, when it was approved that Tío Catalá Avenue be a historic center and hence the affected area that protects the area."

Regarding the "arbitrary expansion" that indicated the opposition of the affected area, the mayor of Xàbia explained that "this is determined by an archaeologist and not by me and confirmed by Heritage. On the map it is understood that the area marked as protected is that because there are an old lime kiln".

Likewise, to the declarations of the opposition groups about the rights that the owner wins, the first mayor points out that "these are not rights, but obligations. Belonging or being in an area of ​​historical affection supposes more obligations to the owner, not rights."

On the other hand, regarding the affirmation of PP, C's and Compromís that "the urban planning infraction of the architect's house would become prescribed (when the PGE is approved)," José Chulvi has pointed out that "the property continues to be on land non-urbanizable of special protection and any infraction that there is is imprescriptible".

Comments
  1. álex says:

    My dear "Intolerable", most learned and beloved commentator... I'll explain it to you.

    A mayor YES who has power over the plans, but over the new ones, not over the old ones until they are replaced. It's called legal certainty. For this reason, because the previous plan was a catastrophe made by the PP to make a fortune, it protects Xàbia. But don't believe me, go see the plans and compare them. You're smart, sure you can.

    And really everything is easier to test. They are colored planes. House in correct color: legal. House in wrong color: illegal. Post-fire requalification: illegal. It has been done? Running to court! Hasn't it been done? to stop talking nonsense.

    I would greet you in the orangutan language, but I don't know that one. Instead I send you a very strong kiss.

  2. neighbor says:

    Chulvi, stop messing around and shoot down anything that's illegal.
    You can inform us of everything in the Auditorium.

  3. Luis says:

    Don't fight because we all know that if one day they get it into their heads to build a "luxury" hotel in La Granadella, they will do it, whether they are from the PP, PSOE, Compromis, etc. They will do it and arrange the papers as they always have done. That they then use the irregularities to throw them in their faces is another matter but not because they care.

  4. Victor says:

    Well, I see it clearly now: the house was built when he was in government… oh, heavens, the PP.

    Now, the new general plan does NOT protect her
    And the new general plan YES that maintains Granadella as an UNTOUCHABLE forest space.
    And if the architect has done something illegal, it will be a JUDGE who orders the demolition, something else will be done.
    And by the way, the new general plan protects 10.000.000 square meters. Surely that's what hurts some.

    It is well explained and easy to understand.

  5. barts people says:

    A local developer/builder “lobby” is rocking the cradle in this matter due to unspeakable speculative feuds/planning interests…

  6. less little words says:

    Chulvi, stop messing around and shoot down anything that's illegal.
    You can inform us of everything in the Auditorium.

  7. Xabiero says:

    Less explanations and more acting.
    If it is illegal, you act, you have to set an example and that no one breaks the laws, no matter what party they are, the laws are the same for everyone.

  8. Intolerable says:

    Chulvi is not someone brilliant nor does he have more training than having been in a bar, but he has understood something: in politics, more in the local, it is all about passing the moment.

    The radical left (or what is the same, professional agitators who mobilize four hangers-on) knows this and that is why they demonstrate regularly to put pressure on it, and if possible causing destruction and damage. But since civilized people don't play that game, left-wing politicians (or mugs who go socialist/communist to get rich) can do whatever they want: people will forget.

    How people forgot about the fires in the natural park and did nothing to prevent the uncontrolled forests from igniting two years later. Or how they did nothing so that after those fires the cape was reclassified and everything was filled with the most horrendous houses we have ever seen, and that have mutilated incredible pieces of mountain.

    Chulvi, some of us will never forget you. Shit exploding from sewers, failed works, lack of police that has brought crime to the paradise of Jávea.

    And the environmentalists shut up. And with pockets fuller than they have ever deserved.

    • Alex says:

      It is intolerable that you say stupid things. Look, after a fire you can't requalify anything. If it is built on the cape, it is because the PREVIOUS PGOU did allow it. The other is a crime, and if you have evidence, your obligation is to go to court. But since you know it's stupid, then you come here to release it.
      Hugs

      • eggs says:

        Hello Chulvi!

        • Alex says:

          Hello eggs!!

        • Intolerable (and Álex Chulvi smells bad) says:

          The ones you don't have, Chulvi.

          So the mayors have no influence on the plans? Have they built for Chulvi what Moragues himself did not build and is it a coincidence?

          Can't do anything about fire prevention? Have maintenance, do a minimum management?

          Do you think that everything is easy to prove, even if it is obvious? Because for a long time the sea thing was shit and the city council proved that it wasn't… until others have proven that it was and they have closed the beach. You are stupid, I do not have a certificate and everyone who has read it knows that it is so empirically.

          The evidence will come to the extent that the corruption you justify allows it.
          And what you call nonsense are unappealable truths, piece of orangutan.


28.803
0
9.411
1.030